Dr Andy Hamilton (Durham University, philosophy) will be speaking at the Staff-Postgraduate seminar on Wednesday November 27. The title of his paper is: “The
Autonomy of Art and the Heteronomy of Entertainment: Louis Armstrong,
Charles Dickens, and Howard Hawks” and he has supplied the following
abstract:
Louis Armstrong
was a very great musical artist, who always thought of himself first as
an entertainer: “My life has been music, it’s always come first, but the
music ain’t worth nothing if you can’t lay
it on the public”. But he knew that his clowning and crowd-pleasing
were compatible with being an artist: “…it’s got to be art because the
world has recognised our music from New Orleans, else it would have been
dead today”. This lecture argues that, like
the modern Western system of the arts, the modern system of
entertainment – music-hall, circuses, professional sport… – did not
assume definite shape till the 18th or 19th century, though its
ingredients were found in classical, medieval and Renaissance periods.
It argues that the highest humane art seeks a broad audience, in a way
often deemed unique to entertainment. The examples of Louis Armstrong,
Charles Dickens and Howard Hawks are contrasted with the more hermetic
high art of Lennie Tristano, Marcel Proust
and Andrei Tarkovsky.
No comments:
Post a Comment